South Korean crypto exchange Bithumb Korea has secured a key legal victory against the country‘s tax
South Korean crypto exchange Bithumb Korea has secured a key legal victory against the country‘s tax authorities. A high court ruled that Bithumb’s virtual assets are not to be classified as inventory, offering much-needed clarity to the digital asset industry.
The dispute stemmed from Bithumb‘s change in its virtual asset valuation method between 2014 and 2017. Tax authorities claimed this led to underreported profits. However, the Seoul High Court sided with Bithumb, emphasizing the lack of regulations at the time. This ruling comes amidst South Korea’s increasing crypto scrutiny, with potential delistings for non-compliant assets looming.
Crucially, the court also determined that Bithumb‘s virtual assets could not be considered inventory assets. The court’s reasoning was based on the nature of the company‘s operations, which are primarily engaged in a brokerage business rather than holding assets as inventory. This also relieved the trading platform of the obligation to report changes in its valuation method, further weakening the tax authorities’ claim.
The ruling comes at a time of South Koreas increasing regulatory crackdown on cryptocurrency. The nation is currently scrutinizing approximately 600 virtual assets against newly established standards, with those failing to comply facing potential delisting. Crypto exchanges like Upbit, Bithumb, Coinone, Korbit, and Gopax have been tasked with conducting rigorous reviews to determine which digital assets should remain listed under the new regulatory framework.
With Bithumbs latest victory offering some clarification on the tax treatment of virtual assets, the broader regulatory environment continues to tighten. The crackdown on non-compliant assets and the legal battle faced by Bithumb Korea are both indicative of the growing regulatory oversight in the country.
Disclaimer: The information presented in this article is for informational and educational purposes only. The article does not constitute financial advice or advice of any kind. Coin Edition is not responsible for any losses incurred as a result of the utilization of content, products, or services mentioned. Readers are advised to exercise caution before taking any action related to the company.
Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.
North Korean Malware Targets macOS Users by Evading Apple Notarization
Thune helped cosponsor a crypto bill in 2022 called the Digital Commodities Consumer Protection Act
DeltaPrime Protocol Attacked on Arbitrum and Avalanche, Resulting in $4.8 Million Loss
Polymarket Founder Raided by FBI After Trump Win, Company Says
0.00