The staking ecosystem is growing rapidly, with rising institutional interest and potential regulator
The staking ecosystem is growing rapidly, with rising institutional interest and potential regulatory oversight. Everstake, a blockchain validator, secures over 80 cryptocurrencies and supports some of the industry‘s leading networks. In an exclusive interview, Sergey Vasylchuk, Everstake CEO discussed the platform’s origins, the challenges of staking, regulatory developments, and the role of governance in blockchain ecosystems.
Balancing Growth, Security, and Risk Management
Everstakes journey began as an experimental project while Vasylchuk was building a cryptocurrency exchange. As a software developer with a background in payments and banking, he was focused on making blockchain technology faster and more practical for financial institutions. However, the limitations of early proof-of-work networks, including slow transaction speeds, led him to explore proof-of-stake (PoS) solutions.
“When I first saw EOS, it was mind-blowing—transactions in under two seconds. Thats when I realized we were getting closer to the speed financial systems require,” Vasylchuk explained. His team became deeply involved in optimizing blockchain performance, and developing techniques to improve network efficiency. The success of these innovations led Everstake to emerge as a validator for multiple blockchains, evolving into a full-scale infrastructure provider for over 80 blockchain projects today.
Everstake‘s role goes beyond staking; it acts as a crucial infrastructure layer for blockchains, bridges, and decentralized applications. “We’re not just validators. We support blockchain ecosystems, ensure security, and help new networks scale,” Vasylchuk emphasized.
With staking becoming a mainstream feature in crypto, validators face increasing operational and security challenges. Managing thousands of keys and servers requires rigorous risk management processes to prevent costly mistakes. Vasylchuk noted that Everstake maintains an uptime of nearly 99.9%, a testament to its dedication to reliability.
“The biggest challenge isn‘t running existing blockchains, it’s onboarding new testnets. New networks come with design flaws and bugs, and choosing the right emerging blockchain to support requires careful technical evaluation,” he said.
To strengthen institutional confidence, Everstake recently secured SOC 2 Type 1 certification, a widely recognized security standard. While retail stakers trust the company based on its long-standing reputation, institutional investors require additional verification. “For many institutions, it‘s not about whether they trust us, it’s a requirement. Without the certification, they simply cannot work with us,” Vasylchuk explained.
Ethereum Staking Growth and Market Outlook
Ethereum has seen a steady 4% increase in staked ETH over the past year, signaling long-term confidence in PoS networks. Vasylchuk believes this growth will continue, drawing comparisons to Solana, where over 65% of tokens are staked.
“Ethereum staking is still relatively low at 27%, meaning there‘s significant room for growth. Looking at networks like Solana, we expect Ethereum’s staking percentage to increase substantially,” he noted.
Beyond Ethereum and Solana, Vasylchuk sees potential in newer staking ecosystems but believes long-term success depends on strong governance models. “Staking isn‘t just about earning rewards, it’s about governance. When you stake, youre delegating your voting power. Unfortunately, many users prioritize APR over choosing responsible validators,” he cautioned.
The Role of Validators in Blockchain Governance
As a major validator across multiple networks, Everstake plays a key role in governance decisions. However, Vasylchuk dismissed concerns that large validators pose a centralization risk. “Despite being one of the biggest, our stake in Solana is only 1.4%, in Sui, it‘s 1.3%. That’s far from centralization,” he clarified.
Instead, he pointed to centralized exchanges as a greater threat to blockchain governance. “Exchanges control staked funds but dont allow users to participate in governance. This weakens decentralization and gives them disproportionate influence over networks,” he warned.
Regulatory Uncertainty and Institutional Adoption
With governments increasingly focused on cryptocurrency regulation, staking is coming under greater scrutiny. Vasylchuk believes regulators still lack a deep understanding of staking, often misinterpreting it as a purely financial instrument rather than a governance mechanism.
“When we explain staking as a voting process, regulators get confused. They want to regulate it, but they dont know how,” he said. However, he remains optimistic that clearer regulations under the new U.S. administration could create pathways for institutions to fully embrace staking.
“If institutions gain regulatory clarity, we could see staking ETFs or publicly traded staking companies emerge, unlocking massive new investment streams,” Vasylchuk predicted.
2025 and Beyond: A Bullish Outlook
Despite regulatory uncertainties, Vasylchuk believes 2025 will be a strong year for staking, driven by a bullish market, institutional entry, and greater regulatory clarity. However, the full potential of staking will only be realized once traditional financial institutions can access it through regulated investment vehicles.
“A staking ETF would be a game-changer. It‘s not a matter of if, it’s when. With proper risk management and regulation, staking could become a multi-trillion-dollar market,” he concluded.
As Everstake continues to expand its role in blockchain governance and security, Vasylchuk remains committed to bridging the gap between crypto and traditional finance. His dual mission of optimizing blockchain infrastructure while educating regulators positions Everstake as a pivotal player in the future of decentralized finance.
Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.
0.00