Global blockchain supervision and query platform

English
Download

Ethereum Still Accounts for 90% of Fees as Layer 2s Struggle to Deliver Revenue

Ethereum Still Accounts for 90% of Fees as Layer 2s Struggle to Deliver Revenue WikiBit 2025-08-04 18:53

Ethereum-based DeFi protocols might want to think twice before rolling out on every Layer 2, as data shows most fees still accrue on the mainnet.While the

Aave Fees by Blockchain

Meanwhile, the combined TVL of a constellation of Layer 2 chains — Arbitrum, Avalanche, Base, Polygon, Optimism, Sonic, Scroll, Linea, Celo, and Soneium — pales in comparison, and so does their contribution to fee income.

For instance, Scroll generated only $46,366 for Aave in June, meaning less than $1,500 per day, while Gnosis fared slightly better with $93,241.

Curve Finances numbers tell a similar story. For the same period, fees hovered around $2 million, with about $1 million converting to revenue. Ethereum pools dominated that tally, leaving the smaller L2s with only a fraction of the pie. While a granular breakdown by chain is scarce, the available data paints a picture of modest returns for many of these newer deployments.

Saturation Point

Ignas, co-founder of DeFi creative studio Pink Brains, said in an X post on Aug. 1 that the industry might have hit “an L2 saturation point,” noting that Aave probably won‘t move forward with a Bob BTC Layer 2 launch even though it passed a temp-check vote, since current deployments haven’t really paid off financially.

Some have already raised concerns that a few Layer 2s are barely pulling in $1,500 a day in fees, not nearly enough to justify all the work and resources involved. On Curves forum, a user under the alias “phil_00Llama” proposed stopping all new Layer 2 development, saying it takes a lot of developer time and resources but only brings in about $1,500 a day in fees, far too little to cover the high upkeep costs of these fast-changing chains.

However, the discussion on this proposal has been quiet, with few responses. Those who did reply expressed skepticism about halting L2 development entirely, suggesting that there may still be opportunities worth pursuing on these chains.

The real costs of running protocols on L2s aren‘t always clear, making profitability hard to measure. For example, Aave’s expansion onto Scroll required committing $500,000 worth of AAVE tokens in the safety module, while its move onto Gnosis required up to $5 million in capital dedicated to supporting GHO liquidity. GHO is Aaves native stablecoin with a market capitalization of roughly $300 million.

With fees already low — and revenues even lower — projects aiming to be everywhere on Ethereum may need to rethink their strategy, as some deployments may require more effort than theyre worth.

Disclaimer:

The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.

  • Crypto token price conversion
  • Exchange rate conversion
  • Calculation for foreign exchange purchasing
/
PC(S)
Current Rate
Available

0.00