Ether futures open interest hits all-time high as ETH price tops $4.5K — Will it last？

ETH open interest soared to a record high as Ether price rallied through $4,500. Is the rally sustainable？

Key takeaways:

• Ether derivatives data shows weak demand for leveraged bullish positions.
• Corporations and TradFi favor independent layer-1 chains, challenging Ethereums dominance in decentralized finance.

Ether (ETH) surged to $4,518 on Tuesday as traders showed a higher risk appetite following a modest 0.1% rise in US consumer inflation. Yet, beneath the surface, derivatives data suggests the rally‘s strength may be overstated, particularly as some major companies are pursuing their own layer-1 strategies instead of building on Ethereum’s layer-2 ecosystem.

Edit the caETH futures aggregate open interest, ETH. Source: CoinGlass

The ETH futures aggregate open interest rose to $60.8 billion, up from $47 billion a week earlier. However, the increase stems mainly from ETHs price appreciation, as open interest in Ether terms remains 11% below the July 27 peak of 15.5 million ETH.

ETH derivatives signal weak demand for leveraged bullish positions

Derivatives metrics show reduced demand for leveraged bullish exposure despite strong spot market gains.

ETH perpetual futures annualized premium. Source: laevitas.ch

The ETH perpetual futures annualized premium is now 11%, considered neutral. Readings above 13% indicate excessive demand for leveraged long positions, last observed on Saturday. This lack of momentum from aggressive traders is notable given the magnitude of the recent price rally.

One should assess monthly ETH futures to gain an additional perspective, given that perpetual contracts are retail traders preferred instrument. These contracts with a set expiry date typically trade at a 5% to 10% annualized premium to spot prices, reflecting the extended settlement period.

ETH 30-day futures annualized premium. Source: laevitas.ch

After reaching 11% on Monday, the premium fell back to 8% on Tuesday. Despite a 32% increase in ETH price over the past 10 days, leveraged long interest has not returned to levels seen in previous bullish cycles, suggesting unease about Ethereums fundamentals and onchain activity trends.

Source: X/techleadhd

X user techleadhd noted that Stripe, Circle, Tether, and JPMorgan have launched their own chains rather than adopting Ethereum layer-2 solutions. While this view incorrectly assesses Coinbase and Robinhood, which remain anchored to Ethereums base layer, it illustrates that some enterprises prefer layer-1 control and tailored infrastructure.

Tokenized assets, including stablecoins backed by traditional reserves, require less decentralization to function effectively. Products from JPMorgan and Stripe aim to keep users within closed ecosystems, not enable withdrawals to public networks. For such models, Ethereum layer-2 integration offers limited incentives.

Weak Ethereum onchain activity and layer-1 competition

There is growing institutional demand for ETH, reflected in spot exchange-traded fund inflows, yet onchain metrics tell a less optimistic story. The total value locked (TVL) on the Ethereum network fell by 7% over the past 30 days.

Ethereum TVL (left) vs. Ethereum weekly fees (right). Source: DefiLlama

TVL declined to 23.3 million ETH from 25.4 million ETH a month earlier, while weekly base layer fees totaled $7.5 million, a 27% drop from the prior month. More strikingly, Ethereums weekly fees remain lower than those of key competitors, with Solana at $9.6 million and Tron at $14.3 million.

Several major players focusing on their own layer-1 solutions reinforce concerns over Ethereums competitiveness as decentralized infrastructure for Web3 and financial applications.

Ultimately, the nominal increase in ETH futures open interest is largely a function of the 51% ETH price rally over the past 30 days, not a surge in demand for leveraged long positions.

This article is for general information purposes and is not intended to be and should not be taken as legal or investment advice. The views, thoughts, and opinions expressed here are the authors alone and do not necessarily reflect or represent the views and opinions of Cointelegraph.