WikiBit 2025-12-26 04:40Bitcoin’s dominance is declining as traders reduce perpetual contract activity from 80 million to 13 million daily, shifting capital toward Ethereum amid
Bitcoins dominance is declining as traders reduce perpetual contract activity from 80 million to 13 million daily, shifting capital toward Ethereum amid balanced market liquidations of $67.42 million long and $64.53 million short.
What is Causing Bitcoin Dominance Decline?
Bitcoin dominance decline stems from reduced perpetual contract trading volumes, dropping from approximately 80 million to 13 million daily, as reported by Alphractal data. This shift reflects investors reallocating from Bitcoins stagnant range of $85,000 to $90,000 toward assets like Ethereum with stronger momentum. Overall market sentiment balances, with neutral RSI and even liquidations, marking a pivotal investor decision phase.
How Is Capital Rotating to Ethereum?
Capital rotation to Ethereum is evident in sustained contract activity at around 17 million, contrasting Bitcoin‘s sharp fall. The ETH/BTC ratio climbed 14% between November 24 and December 8, per TradingView charts, indicating Ethereum’s relative strength as long as it holds above 0.03. Spot market inflows reached $87 million in the last two days, driven by institutional and public company interest, bolstering Ethereum‘s appeal without Bitcoin’s exhaustion signals.
Source: Alphractal
The broader cryptocurrency market, previously tilted bearish, now shows a more equilibrium state with balanced bullish and bearish forces. Over the past 24 hours, long position liquidations totaled $67.42 million, nearly matching short liquidations at $64.53 million. The markets Relative Strength Index (RSI) hovers at neutral levels, suggesting a consolidation period where investors evaluate optimal capital deployment.
Frequently Asked QuestionsWhy Are Bitcoin Perpetual Contracts Declining?
Bitcoin perpetual contracts have declined from 80 million to 13 million daily trades due to range-bound price action between $85,000 and $90,000, prompting traders to exit positions. Data from Alphractal highlights this trend, with investors favoring stablecoins or alternatives like Ethereum for better directional opportunities in the neutral market sentiment.
What Does the ETH/BTC Ratio Indicate for Ethereums Future?
The ETH/BTC ratios 14% rise from November 24 to December 8 points to increasing capital inflows into Ethereum relative to Bitcoin. As long as it sustains above the 0.03 support level, Ethereums attractive positioning persists, supported by steady contract volumes and recent spot purchases exceeding $87 million, per TradingView analysis.
Source: TradingView
This rotation aligns with Ethereum‘s resilience amid volatility, where trader participation remains consistent. Experts note that such shifts often precede broader altcoin rallies, as liquidity concentrates in ecosystems with active development and institutional adoption. Sustained spot demand, including from public companies accumulating Ethereum, underscores this trend’s foundation.
What Are the Key Liquidation Levels for Ethereum?
Liquidation clusters serve as critical price magnets for Ethereum, with data from CoinGlass revealing three major zones above and below current levels. These clusters highlight potential volatility points, where cascading liquidations could drive sharp moves. Upward momentum might target $3,060, while downward pressure could test $2,800 support.
Source: CoinGlass
The market‘s current balance, with neutral RSI and even liquidations, positions Ethereum favorably for potential upside if buy-side pressure prevails. Institutional inflows and spot accumulations further validate this capital rotation from Bitcoin, emphasizing Ethereum’s role in the evolving crypto landscape.
Key Takeaways
Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.
0.00