WikiBit 2025-12-31 19:55Trading XRP$1.8736 and solana SOL$126.28 felt twice as bumpy as bitcoin BTC$88,832.48 in 2025, dashi
Trading XRP$1.8736 and solana SOL$126.28 felt twice as bumpy as bitcoin BTC$88,832.48 in 2025, dashing hopes of market maturation beyond the largest cryptocurrency.
Realized volatility over the past 365 days hit 87% for solana and 80% for XRP compared with BTC's calmer 43%, according to data tracked by CoinDesk Indices. BNB BNB$867.04 clocked 55% and ether ETH$2,985.70 77%.
Altcoins have tended to be more volatile than bitcoin over the years. Still, the latest data stands out because it shows that exchange-traded funds and other alternative investment vehicles tied to these tokens need to pull in deeper liquidity to match BTC's chill.
Except for BNB, the four largest coins by market value (excluding stablecoins) have CME futures and U.S.-listed spot ETFs as proxies for institutional activity.
SOL is the most volatile among top five tokens by market value, except stablecoins. (CoinDesk Indices)
Read More
XRP ETFs have pulled in over $1 billion in investor money since their debut in November, according to data source SoSoValue. The equally nascent SOL ETFs have amassed $763.91 million.
If the demand remains strong in the coming year, it could dampen price volatility, as observed in bitcoin.
Bitcoin spot ETFs, which debuted in January 2024, have attracted $56.96 billion in net inflows to date. This surge has fueled interest in advanced products such as covered calls on those ETFs, leading to a steady decline in volatility in BTC this year.
The same can be said about ether ETFs, which started trading the following July and have seen net inflows of $12.4 billion since their debut in mid-2024.
Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.
0.00