WikiBit 2026-02-26 17:26Advertisement     Wikipedia co-founder Jimmy Wales has offered a bleak long-term outlook for Bitcoin, suggesting that although
Bitcoin
Why Wikipedia Co-Founder Projects BTC Price Below $10,000 by 2050 ⋆ ZyCrypto
Wikipedia co-founder Jimmy Wales has offered a bleak long-term outlook for Bitcoin, suggesting that although the leading cryptocurrency is unlikely to collapse entirely, it may gradually lose relevance. He predicted that by 2050, Bitcoin could gravitate back below $10,000 as it drifts into relative obscurity.
Why Bitcoin Risks Falling Toward $10,000, According to Wikipedias Jimmy Wales
In a Feb. 25 post on X, Wales suggested that Bitcoins underlying design gives it staying power, yet he claims that its limited practical use will ultimately confine it to a niche role, more like a hobbyists collectible than a widely adopted asset.
Despite expecting Bitcoin to endure, Wales views that longevity as largely meaningless. He described the cryptocurrency as having fallen short as both a medium of exchange and a reliable store of value, adding that he does not see it evolving into the
 
Wales‘ comments didn’t resonate well with the wider Bitcoin and crypto community, who pushed back at the Wikipedia co-founder. One X user pointed out that Bitcoin currently benefits from substantial institutional backing. With exchange-traded funds, futures, and indices now in place, traditional finance players are generating substantial revenues by catering to this soaring demand.
However, Wales portrayed traditional finance intermediaries as driven purely by profit rather than conviction, arguing that if investor enthusiasm fades, they would have little hesitation in allowing these products to steadily wilt.
The Wikipedia executive also challenged the widely held belief that Bitcoin could function as a crucial financial lifeline for people under authoritarian rule.
Responding to claims that tighter controls on digital freedoms would boost adoption, he expressed doubt. Wales pointed to Bitcoins usability hurdles, price volatility, and limited acceptance, arguing that it remains better suited to enthusiasts. In his view, traditional safe-haven assets such as precious metals, property, and art are likely to retain their dominance.
Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.
0.00