USDC nears all-time high as stablecoin cap gains 0.93% w/w

Tech

USDC nears all-time high as stablecoin cap gains 0.93% w/w

USDC market cap all-time high status: near $80B unconfirmed

USDCs market cap has been described as nearing $80 billion and an all-time high, alongside a reported 0.93% weekly rise in the total stablecoin market. These figures remain unconfirmed pending cross-source verification.

As reported by Bernstein, USDC supply reached about $72.5 billion in 2025, indicating proximity to the cited level without confirming a fresh record. No recognized provider here explicitly verifies an $80 billion peak.

Why this matters for stablecoin liquidity and market structure

A higher USDC float typically adds dollar liquidity across exchanges and DeFi, tightening spreads and improving routing. It can also lower settlement frictions for on-chain payments and institutional treasury flows.

Market structure effects depend on composition as well as size. If growth concentrates in regulated, transparent issuance, perceived counterparty and depeg risks can decline, supporting deeper order books and collateral utility.

Perceptions of trust and transparency can materially influence where stablecoin flows concentrate across venues. “the most trusted stablecoin,” said brian armstrong, CEO of Coinbase.

Weekly stablecoin market cap: verifying the claimed 0.93% move

The claim that the total stablecoin market cap rose 0.93% week over week cannot be corroborated here. Weekly deltas hinge on precise timestamps, asset inclusion lists, and treatment of wrapped or bridged supply.

Small sub-1% weekly moves are plausible in steady conditions, but the specific 0.93% figure requires synchronized provider snapshots. Until then, it should be treated as unverified and subject to revision.

How we verify USDC and stablecoin market cap data

Verification relies on triangulating issuer disclosures with independent dashboards and noting timestamps, chain coverage, and methodology notes. Differences often reflect reporting lag rather than fundamental divergence.

DefiLlama vs. CCData methodology and coverage differences

Based on data from DefiLlama and according to CCData, figures can diverge due to chain and token coverage, how bridged or wrapped assets are classified, and update frequency. Reporting lags may briefly widen gaps.

How Circle disclosures align with DefiLlama and CCData figures

According to Circle, periodic disclosures of circulation and reserve composition provide a baseline for market cap. Independent dashboards usually track closely, with any gaps tied to timing or chain-specific issuance.