Shiba Inus shib created a $1 billion AI war chest — and Vitalik regrets it

That pivot is the reason Buterin posted on Friday. He said FLI underwent “an internal pivot by which they started focusing on cultural and political action as a primary method, quite different from the original approach.”

FLIs justification, according to Buterin, is that AGI is advancing rapidly, and the organization needs to move aggressively to counter the lobbying budgets of large AI companies.

“My worry is that large-scale coordinated political action with big money pools is a thing that can easily lead to unintended outcomes, cause backlashes, and solve problems in a way that is both authoritarian and fragile, even if it was not originally intended that way,” he wrote.

He pointed to FLI‘s biosafety approach as an example. The organization’s primary strategy has been to embed guardrails into AI models and bio-synthesis devices so they refuse to create dangerous outputs.

Buterin called this “very fragile,” noting that jailbreaks, fine-tuning, and other workarounds make such restrictions easy to circumvent. He warned that the logical endpoint of that approach leads to “let‘s ban open-source AI” and then “let’s support one good-guy AI company to establish global dominance and dont let anyone else get to the same level.”

“Approaches like this VERY EASILY backfire: they make the rest of the world your enemy,” he wrote.

He also flagged a structural problem with regulation-first strategies. When governments restrict dangerous technology, national security organizations inevitably get exempted, and those same organizations are often a source of the risk themselves. He cited government lab leak programs as an example.

However, Buterin said he‘s been “heartened” by some of FLI’s recent work, specifically a “pro-human AI declaration” that he said, “unites conservatives, progressives and libertarians, America, Europe and China.” He also noted FLI has been researching ways to avoid the concentration of power from AI.

But the core message was clear. A donation Buterin never planned, from tokens he never wanted, funded an organization that pivoted away from the approach he believed in, and is now deploying hundreds of millions of dollars in ways that make him uncomfortable. He shared his concerns with FLI on “several occasions” before going public.

FLI did not immediately reply to CoinDesks request for comments on the donated amount and AI safety concerns.