WikiBit 2026-04-04 11:40Bitcoin fell 11.6% in the first quarter of 2025, its weakest opening quarter in a decade, while broader crypto indexes suffered far steeper losses that
Bitcoin
BTC Fell 11.6%, Altcoins Sank
Bitcoin Ethereum News
Bitcoin fell 11.6% in the first quarter of 2025, its weakest opening quarter in a decade, while broader crypto indexes suffered far steeper losses that exposed a deep rotation out of speculative assets across the digital-asset market.
The quarter began with optimism around a pro-crypto U.S. administration but ended with bitcoin posting a negative return after reaching an all-time high of $109,356 earlier in the period. Altcoins and memecoins fared considerably worse, with some segments losing more than half their value.
What the Verified Q1 2025 Market Report Data Show
The CoinDesk Indices quarterly report, dated April 9, 2025, provides the most complete verified snapshot of Q1 2025 digital-asset performance. The report says bitcoin closed the quarter down 11.6% after touching an all-time high of $109,356.
-11.6%
Bitcoins Q1 2025 return, according to the CoinDesk Indices quarterly report.
That performance made Q1 2025 bitcoins weakest first quarter since 2015, a period that preceded a prolonged accumulation phase before the next cycle rally.
The original headline attributed a Q1 crypto market report to CoinGlass. However, research did not surface a directly fetchable English-language CoinGlass quarterly report supporting that attribution. The verified quarter-end performance figures used in this article come from CoinDesk Indices, not CoinGlass.
Confirmed Data vs. Attribution Uncertainty
CoinDesk Indices explicitly frames its report as a Q1 2025 digital-assets quarterly review. The figures cited, including bitcoins negative 11.6% return and the index-level breakdowns below, are drawn directly from that source.
CoinGlass remains a widely used derivatives data platform, and its liquidation dashboards provide useful context for understanding leverage dynamics during the quarter. But the core performance numbers belong to CoinDesk Indices.
Why Large-Cap Crypto Held Up Better Than the Rest
The quarters damage was not evenly distributed. The CoinDesk 20 Index, which tracks the largest digital assets by market capitalization, returned negative 23.2% in Q1 2025. That was a steep loss, but it outperformed the broader market by a wide margin.
The CoinDesk 80 Index, which covers mid-cap and smaller tokens outside the top 20, returned negative 46.4% over the same period. The Memecoin Index fell 55.2%, losing more than half its value in three months.
Large Caps vs. Speculative Tokens
The gap between the CoinDesk 20‘s negative 23.2% and the Memecoin Index’s negative 55.2% represents more than 30 percentage points of dispersion. That spread signals a clear risk-off quarter, with capital retreating from higher-beta segments into relatively more liquid large-cap positions.
This pattern mirrors what occurred during Q1 of previous down cycles, where speculative tokens typically drawdown two to three times more than bitcoin. Investors who had rotated into memecoins during late 2024, similar to the type of sector-level moves seen in altcoin rallies, faced outsized losses as the quarter progressed.
The CoinDesk 20 Index has generated $14.5 billion in trading volume since January 2024 and is available in 20 investment vehicles globally, underscoring its role as a benchmark for institutional allocators measuring crypto performance against traditional assets.
Bitcoin Still Dominated as the Quarter Turned Historically Weak
Despite posting a negative quarter, bitcoins relative outperformance reinforced its position as the dominant asset in the crypto market. At the time of research, CoinGecko global data showed total crypto market capitalization near $2.383 trillion, with bitcoin dominance sitting near 56.15%.
Bitcoins own market capitalization stood at roughly $1.34 trillion, representing more than half of total crypto market value even after a quarter of declines.
Bitcoin market capitalization from the briefs `market_data` payload.What Bitcoin Leadership Implies for Capital Rotation
When bitcoin loses value but gains market share, it typically signals that capital is leaving altcoins faster than it is leaving bitcoin. This is a defensive rotation pattern, not an accumulation signal for the broader market.
The dynamic is consistent with recent data showing declining Q1 crypto capital flows. Reduced inflows combined with rising bitcoin dominance suggest that new money entering the market favored large-cap exposure over speculative bets.
The Fear and Greed Index reading of 11, labeled “Extreme Fear,” at the time of research further confirms the defensive posture across the market. Sentiment had deteriorated sharply from the optimism that opened the quarter.
Where CoinGlass Fits and What the Evidence Still Lacks
CoinGlass is primarily known for its derivatives data, including liquidation tracking, open interest charts, and funding rate analysis. Its liquidations dashboard was identified during research as the most relevant source for understanding leverage dynamics during Q1.
However, research did not find a directly fetchable English-language CoinGlass Q1 market report page supporting the original headlines attribution. A third-party Chinese-language source referenced a CoinGlass quarterly report, but no primary English-language page was verified.
What Remains Unverified
The CoinGlass public liquidation API endpoint did not return a usable payload during the research phase. As a result, no specific CoinGlass liquidation totals, leverage readings, or derivatives metrics were independently confirmed for this article.
Large-scale liquidation events, like the type of significant on-chain movements tracked in bitcoin wallet flows, often accompany sharp quarterly drawdowns. But without verified CoinGlass data, this article does not estimate a liquidation figure for Q1 2025.
Readers seeking derivatives context should consult CoinGlasss liquidation dashboard directly rather than relying on unverified third-party summaries of its data.
Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.
6.54
0.00