Two owners of Bored Ape Yacht Club NFTs made transaction errors this weekend.
Two owners of Bored Ape Yacht Club NFTs made transaction errors this weekend.
Bored Ape Yacht Club, one of the most popular NFT series, attracted attention this weekend as two users mishandled their tokens.
Seller Underprices Listing by 99%
In one incident, the owner of Bored Ape #3,547 sold that token for much less than they intended.
A user named Max (aka “maxnaut”) listed the token for $3,066 instead of the expected $300,000 based on entry-level prices. The underpriced NFT was immediately snapped up by another user and relisted for $248,000, an amount much closer to its expected price.
The discrepancy was due to a typo, or, in market terminology, a “fat-finger error.” The seller told CNET that the misprice was due to a “lapse of concentration,” and that although he quickly noticed the error, the offer was “sniped” before he could cancel it.
The sale took place on Saturday, Dec. 11, but was first reported and publicized by tech news site CNET on Sunday.
User Sends Bored Ape to Untrusted Project
In another incident, a user who goes by Dilly Dilly reported the possible theft of one of his Bored Ape NFTs early Monday.
In a now-deleted thread, Dilly Dilly wrote that he confirmed a transaction with a derivative project that was “supposed to produce an animated version of [the] ape.”
It appears that the recipient did not follow through on the deal. Dilly Dilly requested that Bored Ape Yacht Club and the OpenSea marketplace attempt to freeze the transaction if possible. Dilly Dilly also offered to repay the new owner of the NFT.
Public reaction was unsympathetic, as critics noted that Dilly Dilly deliberately sent the token. It is unclear whether the receiving project was fraudulent, or whether the project was legitimate and Dilly Dilly merely sent the NFT by mistake. Others suggested that the event did not occur and that Dilly Dilly sent the token to one of his own accounts to attract attention.
In a follow-up thread, Dilly Dilly maintained that he was the victim of fraud and noted that “there are hackers on every corner.” However, he ultimately admitted that “the fault is [his] own.”
Room for Reversible NFT Transactions?
In traditional finance, there is usually a way for banks and payment networks to reverse erroneous transactions. By contrast, cryptocurrency and NFT transactions do not usually allow reversals, as no entity has central control over assets on public blockchains.
One crypto influencer within the NFT community, Loomdart, has suggested that Bored Ape Yacht Club could introduce a “centralized mintpass” that would give some control over transactions to the project itself. This would presumably be optional for users.
It does not appear that BAYC or OpenSea have any interest in implementing such a system. OpenSea does, however, provide advice for users who want to keep their NFTs secure.
Bored Ape Yacht Club is currently the fourth largest series of NFTs by weekly trading volume, with 7,449 ETH ($28 million) traded over the past seven days according to OpenSea.
As a reminder, WikiBit is ready to help you search the qualifications and reputation of projects in a bid to protect you from hidden dangers in this risky industry!
iOS: t.ly/UUCj
Android: t.ly/cfYt
Source: cryptobriefing
Disclaimer:
Ang mga pananaw sa artikulong ito ay kumakatawan lamang sa mga personal na pananaw ng may-akda at hindi bumubuo ng payo sa pamumuhunan para sa platform na ito. Ang platform na ito ay hindi ginagarantiyahan ang kawastuhan, pagkakumpleto at pagiging maagap na impormasyon ng artikulo, o mananagot din para sa anumang pagkawala na sanhi ng paggamit o pag-asa ng impormasyon ng artikulo.
South Korea: Upbit Investigated for Over 500,000 KYC Violations
MacBook Users with Intel Chips Urged to Update for Enhanced Security
Solana-Based Trading Terminal DEXX Hacked, Over $21M in User Losses
South Korea to Enforce 20% Crypto Tax in 2025 with Increased Exemption Limit
0.00