WikiBit 2026-05-02 20:59Arbitrum DAO is discussing releasing the 30.766 ETH transferred by the Kelp DAO attacker to an Arbitrum One address to the DeFi United initiative through
Arbitrum DAO is discussing releasing the 30.766 ETH transferred by the Kelp DAO attacker to an Arbitrum One address to the DeFi United initiative through a vote by ARB token holders. The vote received strong ‘yes’ support with 16.9 million ARB in the first hour; no ‘no’ votes and it will continue until May 7. This move aims to redirect the frozen funds to rescue the DeFi ecosystem. The Arbitrum Security Council‘s quick intervention reflects the community’s urgent response. Suspicion that the attacker is linked to North Koreas Lazarus Group heightens the criticality of the incident.
Arbitrum DAO Kelp DAO Attack and ETH Freezing Process
On April 20, the Council locked 71.1 million dollars worth of ETH to limit the attack. Funds were transferred to the 0x0000000000000000000000000000000000000DA0 address; DAO approval required. Hackers withdrew 18% of Kelps rsETH (292 million dollars) and transferred it to AAVE Detailed Analysis, Compound, and Euler, creating 236 million dollars in debt. Protocols paused contracts; the Council used emergency powers with a 12/9 vote. Some criticized centralization, while others defended the ecosystem mandate.
DeFi United Solidarity Led by AAVE
DeFi United was established under Aave‘s leadership and collected 311 million dollars in ETH/stablecoin. If approved, Arbitrum will make the largest contribution; Consensys (Joseph Lubin 30K ETH), Mantle (30K ETH loan) to follow. Stani Kulechov, LayerZero, and Kelp provided support. This demonstrates DeFi’s crisis organization power.
AAVE Price: Critical Support and Resistance Levels
Arbitrum DAO Vote and Frequently Asked Questions About AAVE
Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.
0.00