Key Highlights:SEC sets October 16, 2025, as deadline for five spot Solana ETF applications. Industry experts expect ETF approval, following amended S-1
SEC Delays Spot Solana ETF Decision, Market Awaits Verdict
The US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has an extension for spot Solana ETF applications, moving the final decision date to October 16, 2025. Five major funds are in line for review:
Most applications were accepted for review in February, triggering a formal 240-day window. The SEC said it needs additional time to “thoroughly study the proposed rule change,” prompting the new deadline:
“The Commission believes it is appropriate to establish a longer period for issuing a ruling to approve or disapprove a proposed rule change to allow it sufficient time to consider the proposed rule change and the issues raised by it,” the official documents state.
Despite the delay, the evaluation process is active—issuers were asked to submit amended S-1 forms in July.
Bloomberg Intelligence analyst Eric Balchunas forecast said these funds could be approved as early as the summer, pointing to the launch of , which used alternative mechanisms for listing. His colleague James Seyffarth confirmed expectations for a mid-October approval.
Spot Solana ETFs would represent a major milestone for the crypto sector, enabling broader investor access to altcoin exposure alongside established spot Bitcoin and Ethereum funds.
Approval could drive further institutional adoption, incentivize product innovation, and maintain Solanas momentum as a leading blockchain for DeFi and Web3 projects.
As competition intensifies in the ETF race, asset managers and investors alike are closely tracking the SECs process for clues about future industry dynamics.
Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.
0.00