WikiBit 2026-07-20 17:16On Uniswap v3, about 54% of liquidity in positions under $1,000 was out of range compared to 26% for positions above $1 million, yet those larger positions represented 47% of all idle capital, roughly $260 million. Individual wallets accounted for 82–94% of idle capital across chains, indicating user-deposited liquidity requiring manual adjustments is more likely to fall out of range. Dune estimated these out-of-range providers could miss roughly $150 million in annual fees, based on a blended in-range fee APR of about 35%, though the income is not guaranteed due to transaction costs, execution risk, and adverse price exposure. The research was commissioned by 1inch ahead of a planned liquidity protocol launch, with Dune developing its methodology independently.
Around 54% of liquidity in positions below $1,000 was out of range, compared with 26% for positions above $1 million. Yet positions worth more than $1 million accounted for 47% of all idle capital, or roughly $260 million.
While contract-managed positions stayed within a more consistent range, individual wallets accounted for between 82% and 94% of the attributed idle capital on Uniswap v3, depending on the chain. That suggests liquidity deposited directly by users and requiring manual adjustments is more likely to go unattended and fall out of range.
Dune estimated that these out-of-range providers, that are sitting idle, could be missing roughly $150 million in fees each year, based on a blended in-range fee APR of about 35%.
Liquidity providers deposit token pairs that decentralized exchanges use to complete swaps. They earn a share of the fees paid for trades using that liquidity pool while their positions remain in the range they set.
However, the research said that the figure is not guaranteed recoverable income. Keeping positions active can add transaction costs, execution risk and exposure to unfavorable price movements.
1inch commissioned the research ahead of the planned launch of , a new liquidity protocol. Dune said it developed the methodology and reached its conclusions independently.
Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.
Bitcoin outlook improves amid 6% weekly gain: Can BTC bulls push higher?
WikiBit 2026-07-17 18:49Bitcoin buyers and bagholders are both selling into the rebound below $70,000
WikiBit 2026-07-17 17:01CryptoQuant says Strategy still needs disciplined bitcoin buying and selling framework
WikiBit 2026-07-18 04:01Galaxy lands 15-year Texas Tech stadium naming rights deal
WikiBit 2026-07-18 05:19Augur returns with decentralized layer for disputed prediction markets
WikiBit 2026-07-18 04:33ECB Warns Stablecoins May Drain Bank Deposits—Here's What That Means
WikiBit 2026-07-18 04:17Is XRP a Good Investment in 2026? Price Analysis and Prediction
WikiBit 2026-07-18 02:59Early Uber Investor: Bitcoin Has Strategy Problem
WikiBit 2026-07-18 05:01FILE Price Prediction: Dead Center Won't Hold — $0.72 or $0.82 Decision Is Coming Fast
WikiBit 2026-07-18 04:46Is Cerebras Systems (CBRS) Stock a Buy Following Its IPO Pullback?
WikiBit 2026-07-18 04:430.00