Citadel Securities has urged the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission to proceed cautiously with any initiatives that would accelerate the adoption of
The firm emphasized the risk of new, opaque trading venues that could be off-limits to regulated institutional players such as pension funds, insurance companies, and endowments, whose mandates and compliance requirements may prevent them from engaging with blockchain-based platforms.
The firm also cautioned that the growing interest in tokenization from digital asset platforms could lead to a form of regulatory arbitrage, where newer entrants benefit from looser oversight compared to established financial institutions. This, Citadel warned, could ultimately undermine investor protections and distort competitive dynamics in capital markets.
The SEC has not provided a timeline for any decisions on tokenized securities, but the issue has gained traction as part of broader discussions around digital asset regulation. The recent passage of stablecoin legislation has added momentum to these conversations, with lawmakers and regulators now examining the role of blockchain in traditional finance more closely.
Major digital asset platforms, including Coinbase and Robinhood, have publicly supported tokenization as a way to modernize equity markets. By contrast, Citadels response signals that some of the largest traditional trading firms remain skeptical, particularly in the absence of clear regulatory guardrails.
As the SEC weighs whether and how to permit tokenized securities under existing law, the divergence in industry perspectives highlights the complexity of integrating blockchain technology into established financial systems without compromising market structure, transparency, or investor access.
Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.
0.00