Venus Protocol phishing attack: a DeFi user lost $27 million after approving a malicious transaction that granted attackers permission to drain vUSDT and
Venus Protocol phishing attack: a DeFi user lost $27 million after approving a malicious transaction that granted attackers permission to drain vUSDT and vUSDC. Venus paused the protocol for security reviews and says the incident stems from a compromised wallet approval, not a smart-contract flaw.
Venus Protocol paused the platform to conduct security reviews but said the $27 million loss was not linked to a flaw in its contracts.
What happened in the Venus Protocol phishing attack?
Venus Protocol phishing attack occurred when a DeFi user approved a malicious transaction that granted an attacker permission to transfer assets, resulting in roughly $27 million stolen. Venus confirmed the incident appears to be a compromised wallet approval and paused the protocol while security reviews proceed.
,
,
];
var adplace = document.getElementById(“ads-bitget”);
if (adplace) {
var sessperindex = parseInt(sessionStorage.getItem(“adsindexBitget”));
var adsindex = isNaN(sessperindex) ? Math.floor(Math.random() * adscodesBitget.length) : sessperindex;
adplace.innerHTML = adscodesBitget[adsindex];
sessperindex = adsindex === adscodesBitget.length – 1 ? 0 : adsindex + 1;
sessionStorage.setItem(“adsindexBitget”, sessperindex);
}
})();
A blockchain security firm, PeckShield, reported that a single user lost approximately $27 million after interacting with a phishing contract. On-chain traces indicate the wallet held roughly $19.8 million in Venus USDT (vUSDT) and $7.15 million in Venus USDC (vUSDC) before funds were moved out following the malicious approval.
The attacker used a phishing flow to trick the user into signing an approval transaction that granted token-transfer rights. Once approval was granted, the attacker executed transfers to external addresses and wrapped assets were moved off-chain. On-chain analytics show the pattern of approval → approvals exploited → asset transfers consistent with phishing drains.
Venus paused borrowing and other protocol functions as a precautionary measure while conducting security reviews. The protocols official statement (posted on its social channels) emphasized that the incident appears related to user error or a compromised wallet, not a smart-contract vulnerability. The pause aims to protect users while auditors examine the situation.
];
var adplace = document.getElementById(“ads-binance”);
if (adplace) {
var sessperindex = parseInt(sessionStorage.getItem(“adsindexBinance”));
var adsindex = isNaN(sessperindex) ? Math.floor(Math.random() * adscodesBinance.length) : sessperindex;
adplace.innerHTML = adscodesBinance[adsindex];
sessperindex = adsindex === adscodesBinance.length – 1 ? 0 : adsindex + 1;
sessionStorage.setItem(“adsindexBinance”, sessperindex);
Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.
8.98
0.00